Should reviewers of papers have their names published?: Reviewing is not vicarious authorship
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Read Your Published Papers
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره نوزدهم، دی 1399، 1014-1013 مقالات منتشر شده خودتان را بخوانید Read Your Published Papers محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تا کنون در مجله دانشگاه، پیرامون مطالعه مستمر یک مقاله قبل از چاپ آن توسط نویسندگان، نکات مهمی را به رشته تحریر در آورده‌ایم [3-1]. مطالعه‌ی چند باره یک مقاله، قبل از آن که مقاله منتشر گردد،...
متن کاملPublishing the names of reviewers
M. BLOMBÄCK ,* B . A . K ONKLE , M. J . MANCOJOHNSON , K . BREMME,§ M. HELLGR EN– and R . KAAJA** O N B EHALF OF THE ISTH SSC SU BCOMMITTEE ON WOMEN’S H EALTH ISSUES *Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Coagulation Research, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Penn Comprehensive Hemophilia and Thrombosis Program, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelph...
متن کاملLast Words Reviewing the Reviewers
I just returned from the Association for Computational Linguistics’ 43rd Annual Meeting (ACL-2005). The acceptance rate was 18%. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? When the acceptance rate is low, precision tends to be high. The audience can judge precision for itself. If the presentations are good, everyone knows it. And if they aren’t, they know that as well. ACL-2005 had great precision. R...
متن کاملReviewing scientific papers.
Guidelines for the preparation of structured reports for laboratory studies, clinical studies, epidemiological studies, and observations could be useful. A structured report should prompt reviewers to acknowledge familiarity or otherwise with method, background papers, and so on. New reviewers could draw up their own system. Reports should be helpful and courteous so that whether or not the pap...
متن کاملReviewing, Reviewers and the Scientific Enterprise
Despite their critical importance to the scientific enterprise, reviewers receive no formal training and reviewing has become a skill that they pick up through trial and error. Additionally, because most reviewers do not receive any feedback on their performance, any bad reviewing habits become entrenched over time. This has contributed to significant and unnecessary anxiety about reviewing and...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 2004
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7457.113